BeacXby Elites AlgorithmFree check

SEO audit report example: four real reports from our own sites

These are four unedited BeacX verdicts from October 2026, one for each of four websites we run. They scored 93, 87, 83 and 21, and each one led with a different kind of work. Below them is a walk through everything else a full audit contains.

Get one for your site, free

One-page verdictgoldpricedesk.com, our own site · 20 Oct 2026 · 25 pages read
93 /100

StrongNo page-level problem worth charging you to fix. The work is off the site.

  • Crawler accessCan AI bots fetch the pages?100
  • Entity clarityCan engines tell what the site is?100
  • Answer extractabilityCan an answer be lifted cleanly?90
  • Authorship and trustCan they see who wrote it, and when?83

Checked on the live page

  • /calculator/nothing to fix
  • /ar/sa/24k/gram/nothing to fix
  • /qa/nothing to fix
Top fix: Nothing on the pages worth paying us forFull sample
VerdictAll PagesAI Crawler AccessMultilingual Audit+ 50 sheets

Choose a site to see its verdict. Each one is unedited.

Four sites, four different answers

Site Pages read Score What the report said first
goldpricedesk.com, a gold price site 25 93 Strong. No page-level problem worth charging you to fix.
joycheck.io, a controller testing tool in seven languages 115 87 Authority gap. The pages are readable, and AI answers still cite other sites.
solitär-gross.com, a German card game site 16 83 Two key pages are missing the structured data that names the site and who runs it. Worth 6.7 points.
proofridge.com, a publisher’s site in preparation 1 21 Blocked. Every page tells Google and AI engines not to list it.

goldpricedesk.com: when the honest answer is “nothing to fix”

Crawler access 100, entity clarity 100, answer extractability 90, authorship and trust 83. The report says plainly that it found no page-level problem worth charging for, and that the remaining work is off the site. A report that cannot say “you are fine” is selling, not auditing.

joycheck.io: readable pages, cited by nobody yet

Three layers scored 100 and authorship and trust scored 48. The measured run on 17 October 2026 found the site cited in none of the AI answers that came back. That combination is an authority gap: rewriting the pages would not help, and mentions on other sites would. The two fixes worth doing on the pages were update dates on 37 of 85 pages (3.9 points) and named authors on 19 of 85 (1.9 points).

solitär-gross.com: a German site, read in German

Entity clarity scored 61. The homepage has no WebSite block, which is how Google learns the site name it shows in results [2], and the contact page has no Organization block saying who runs the site. The fix takes a developer about an hour and adds 6.7 points. Five structured-data files came with the report.

One of those files shows why a person checks every report. The engine suggested a local business block, with opening hours, for an online card game. That is exactly the line a person removes before a report is sent, and replaces with the website and organisation blocks the site needs.

proofridge.com: the setting that blocks everything

Every page carries a noindex instruction, and Google says it drops such a page entirely from search results [1]. We set it on purpose while the site is being prepared, and BeacX still put it first, worth 25 points and about 15 minutes to undo. On a live business site, a forgotten noindex is the most expensive mistake there is, and the cheapest to fix.

Inside a full audit

The verdict

One page and one score out of 100, averaged over four layers with equal weight: can AI bots fetch the pages, can engines tell what the site is, can an answer be lifted cleanly, and can they see who wrote it and when. Each fix carries the points it would add and a time estimate. A layer we could not measure is left out and named, never scored zero.

The checked findings

Every finding lists the page address, what was seen on the live page, why it matters and what to change. On joycheck.io, the page /controller-vibration-test/ was flagged for no author and no update date. Before a report goes out, a person opens each flagged page and confirms what the engine saw.

The workbook

Our joycheck.io workbook has 59 sheets. Among them: all pages, issues only, broken pages and links, redirects and canonical chains, orphan pages, indexability, crawl budget, internal PageRank, anchor texts, image formats, HTTP headers, mobile layout, JavaScript rendering, schema audit and schema gaps, passage extractability, AI crawler access, llms.txt quality, AI Overview score, name, address and phone consistency, author and reviewer, and the multilingual audit.

Search opportunities

With Search Console access, the audit joins the searches Google already shows you with what the crawl found on each page. On joycheck.io it listed 128 opportunities on 58 pages. The first was two of our pages competing for the search “ps4 controller test”, at positions 6 and 8.1; choosing one page for it was modelled at about 74 extra clicks every 28 days. Every click figure is labelled as modelled, because it is.

Structured data you can paste

Each page that needs it gets its own JSON-LD file. Fields only you know, such as an address, are marked TO FILL IN instead of guessed.

Competitors on one page

Your rank against up to three competitors on 17 measures, the three gaps to close first, and the measures where you already lead.

The full dashboard

One HTML file that opens offline in any browser, in light or dark: overview, AI overview, issues, crawl budget, link opportunities, PageRank and every page. It can be emailed as it is.

Get the same report for your site

The free check is the verdict for your site, with its structured-data files, in 2 working days. The full SEO audit adds everything above. See prices or how we check each report.

Check my site

Sources

  1. Google Search Central, Block search indexing with noindex: https://developers.google.com/search/docs/crawling-indexing/block-indexing
  2. Google Search Central, Site names in Google Search: https://developers.google.com/search/docs/appearance/site-names

Both read 20 October 2026.

Written by Taimoor Bamazai, founder of Elites Algorithm Limited, Dublin. Updated .